|
Post by Patrick Willis on Feb 18, 2010 13:26:39 GMT -5
I posted this on Sunday, the day you originally uploaded shit.
|
|
|
Post by Patrick Willis on Feb 18, 2010 13:28:17 GMT -5
The original file you uploaded had Willis at 91. Gore at 93 I believe. I complained that Willis should be nearer to 100. Now hes 81. Whatever. Im just saying lots of people still dont understand and its leading to people being less interested. I think this is being rushed. Either the rating system makes no sense, or it does and it isnt being explained well. Rushed? How is anyone going to figure out how things work without moving the league forward and learning from mistakes and such? That doesn't make much sense to me. Have you read the thread that explains player's ratings? It's stickied and announced for ALL to view. I think it explains things pretty damn clearly. I've only uploaded one file. One had TC run which was the pre-season one and now this one. It could very much be that you thought you saw Willis with 91 overall, you sure it wasn't tacking? Patrick Willis to me is a top 10 lb, probably top 5. With an overall rating of 89 I think that puts him there. He finished with 124 tackles, 6 sacks, and 3 TFL. I tihnk that's pretty damn spot on with his usual defensive production is it not. I think you're just so used to FBB's simplicity. If FBB had an "overall" rating there wouldn't even be a discussion on this. LOL. No, its not the ratings its that the ratings changed so much. SMith went from 75 to 48 or whatever. I mean if 50 is average and you rate him as below average fine. But for him to go from 70's to 40's is kinda like what?
|
|
|
Post by Joshua Freeman on Feb 18, 2010 13:28:58 GMT -5
I'll leave a message at barcode and see what he says then
|
|
|
Post by Joshua Freeman on Feb 18, 2010 13:31:30 GMT -5
but I'm pretty sure that original one also had TC run
|
|
|
Post by Joshua Freeman on Feb 18, 2010 13:33:55 GMT -5
also take into account I have adjusted and lowered players. This will affect ratings. So Alex Smith was a 76 but then I raised guys like Schaub, Rodgers, Brees, etc who were "fairly low" by their standards and that could certainly have pushed Alex Smith down.
|
|
|
Post by Joshua Freeman on Feb 18, 2010 14:05:59 GMT -5
Spencer does this work?
|
|
dj
Rookie
Denver Broncos
Posts: 40
|
Post by dj on Feb 18, 2010 14:08:24 GMT -5
Question - Why are Dumervil and Clady rated so poorly? Clady made the pro bowl this year, so he should be top 10 at his position and Dumervil led the league in sacks(so speed, agility should be very high for a DE/LB). Fraudulent.
|
|