|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 2:18:27 GMT -5
Post by Jay Cutler on Feb 19, 2010 2:18:27 GMT -5
I have no problem with working on the ratings tomorrow Marty...So let me know.
|
|
ducky
Rookie
Pack Attack
Posts: 57
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 3:49:24 GMT -5
Post by ducky on Feb 19, 2010 3:49:24 GMT -5
I have to make one more complaint. Stats: Player A: 39 catches, 756 yards, 6 TD's. 19.4 YPC. Led the NFL in YPC. v. Player B: 70 catches, 790 yards, 6 TD's. 13.2 YPC. Both players are rookies. Player A is a 27 overall. Player B is an 89 overall. Two things: Mike Wallace, Player A, is severely underrated. Percy Harvin, Player B, is overrated. Jennings 68 catches, 1,113 yards, 16.4 ypc Driver 70 catches, 1,061 yards, 15.2 ypc 6 tds Yet Jennings is only 75, and Driver is only 77. Harvin is either way overrated, or these 2 one-thousand yard WRs don't mean shit.
|
|
ducky
Rookie
Pack Attack
Posts: 57
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 3:52:13 GMT -5
Post by ducky on Feb 19, 2010 3:52:13 GMT -5
Grant is a 57 overall, yet he is the 6th best rusher in the NFL?
Don't know if we can still gripe, but man Grant is getting the low end.
My LBs/DLs are rated pretty low too. Matthews, Kampman, Hawk, and a couple others also got the low end.
|
|
ducky
Rookie
Pack Attack
Posts: 57
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 3:53:57 GMT -5
Post by ducky on Feb 19, 2010 3:53:57 GMT -5
I mean if Benson is gonna be an 80 overall. Grant should be mid 80s, considering Grant has more yards, carries, ypc, tds, etc..
|
|
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 4:08:41 GMT -5
Post by Matt on Feb 19, 2010 4:08:41 GMT -5
Everyone stfu, take your roster and build your own team. There's no way to create a equal playing field.
|
|
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 5:25:11 GMT -5
Post by donatello2424 on Feb 19, 2010 5:25:11 GMT -5
Just because a player had 1 good year doesn't mean they should be rated very highly.
Just accept the ratings and try and build your team that way. Who cares if your RB doesn't have a high overall, look at the actual ratings and see how they are.
|
|
ducky
Rookie
Pack Attack
Posts: 57
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 5:57:47 GMT -5
Post by ducky on Feb 19, 2010 5:57:47 GMT -5
Everyone stfu, take your roster and build your own team. There's no way to create a equal playing field. Dude the 6th best rusher in the NFL has probably the worst ratings of any starter in this game. GTFO Matt. Tiger is my new #1, way too go...
|
|
ducky
Rookie
Pack Attack
Posts: 57
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 5:58:46 GMT -5
Post by ducky on Feb 19, 2010 5:58:46 GMT -5
Just because a player had 1 good year doesn't mean they should be rated very highly. Just accept the ratings and try and build your team that way. Who cares if your RB doesn't have a high overall, look at the actual ratings and see how they are. This is Grant's second 1200+ yard rushing season in a row. And the year before he had 1000 yards. LMAO @ one season. He's a very solid RB. And deserves much better than 56, stfu.
|
|
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 7:38:47 GMT -5
Post by Joshua Freeman on Feb 19, 2010 7:38:47 GMT -5
This is going to mess up the league people need to learn the ratings instead of just bumping everyone up by the time the season starts everyone is going to be rated 90 and above
|
|
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 7:44:59 GMT -5
Post by Joshua Freeman on Feb 19, 2010 7:44:59 GMT -5
After the first season the complaints are going to be that everyone is to good
|
|
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 8:54:58 GMT -5
Post by Joshua Freeman on Feb 19, 2010 8:54:58 GMT -5
Grant is a 57 overall, yet he is the 6th best rusher in the NFL? Don't know if we can still gripe, but man Grant is getting the low end. My LBs/DLs are rated pretty low too. Matthews, Kampman, Hawk, and a couple others also got the low end. If you think Grant is the 6th best rusher in the NFL you should start watching the NFL.
|
|
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 8:57:24 GMT -5
Post by Joshua Freeman on Feb 19, 2010 8:57:24 GMT -5
In no particular order
Chris Johnson, Adrian Peterson, Ray Rice, Cedric Benson, Jamaal Charles, Maurice-Jones Drew, Johnathan Stewart, Deangelo Williams, Steven Jackson and Thomas Jones are all in my opinion much better than Grant.
|
|
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 9:01:31 GMT -5
Post by Joshua Freeman on Feb 19, 2010 9:01:31 GMT -5
And, of course, Santonio is still getting the shaft. He was 7th in the league in receiving yards. He's a little better than a 70 overall; some of his contributing statistics could certainly be a bit higher (specifically his strength and his hands). 70 overall means he's 70% of the best WR. Santonio is not a top 10 WR, top 30 probably. I mean I'm going to sound like a broken record but the ratings have been explained in pretty fair detail in this thread: wfl2010.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=53has everyone read this yet?
|
|
Steve
Rookie
WHO DAT
Posts: 57
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 10:32:34 GMT -5
Post by Steve on Feb 19, 2010 10:32:34 GMT -5
Let's just forget the ratings and get this shit going. Chris already worked with the ratings and can't make everyone happy. At this point we just need to get started.
|
|
|
OK
Feb 19, 2010 10:51:41 GMT -5
Post by Joshua Freeman on Feb 19, 2010 10:51:41 GMT -5
i've joined a league in which everyone has the game.. they used the same file we did, he never touched the ratings and it looks incredible... me bumping everyone up I think is really going to ruin this experience...
|
|